Editorial accountability

Clear sources, visible limits, prompt corrections.

These standards govern Nouriq’s public nutrition guides, calculators, and methodology pages. Our goal is useful consumer education that does not overstate evidence or blur the line between wellness information and medical care.

Effective July 22, 2026Owner: Nouriq Editorial TeamReview cycle: at least every 6 months

Our principles

  • Accuracy before novelty: prefer established, directly relevant evidence over trend-driven claims.
  • Primary sources first: use government guidance, standards, peer-reviewed research, and authoritative food databases wherever possible.
  • Practical context: explain portions, uncertainty, and real-world limits—not just a headline number.
  • No diagnosis or treatment: public content does not prescribe medication changes or replace individualized professional care.
  • Visible accountability: show the owner, publication or review date, sources, and medical-review status.

Publication and review workflow

  1. Define the reader question and the claims needed to answer it.
  2. Collect current primary or institutional sources that directly support those claims.
  3. Draft in plain language and label estimates, limitations, and areas of uncertainty.
  4. Check formulas, thresholds, internal links, metadata, accessibility, and mobile rendering.
  5. Publish with a review date and an explicit disclosure of whether independent clinical review occurred.
  6. Re-review at least every six months, or sooner after a material source, formula, safety, or product change.

Authorship and medical review

Pages identify the team responsible for the content. We do not imply credentials a contributor does not hold. If a licensed clinician or registered dietitian independently reviews a page in the future, we will name the reviewer, relevant credential, scope of review, and date with permission.

Until then, pages clearly state that they have not received independent medical review. Organizational authorship reflects product accountability; it is not a substitute for clinical review.

AI-assisted drafting

Software, including generative AI, may assist with research organization, drafting, or quality checks. A human operator remains accountable for source selection, factual verification, safety language, final publication, and corrections. AI-generated citations are not accepted without opening and verifying the supporting source.

Corrections policy

Send suspected errors to support@eisenlabs.io with the page URL, disputed text or calculation, and a supporting source if available.

  • Safety-significant errors are assessed as soon as practical and may result in immediate removal or correction.
  • Material factual or methodology changes update the page’s review date and, when useful to readers, include a correction note.
  • Minor spelling, formatting, and link repairs may be corrected without a public note.
  • We do not remove accurate content solely because it is unfavorable to Nouriq.

Commercial and privacy boundaries

Educational pages may link to Nouriq account creation, but commercial goals do not change source standards or safety language. Sponsored content, affiliate compensation, or paid endorsements are not currently part of these guides; any future arrangement would be disclosed next to the affected content.

Public analytics are limited to allowlisted events and coarse fields such as page type and search source. Food names, health readings, free-text notes, email addresses, and query text are not included in these SEO conversion events.

Questions or corrections: Contact support@eisenlabs.io. Privacy requests should go to privacy@eisenlabs.io.